Two business arrangements common within
conventional agriculture are contract growing and vertical
integration. These systems are largely responsible for the shift
toward consolidation within agriculture and tend to be harmful
to farmers, both those who have stayed outside of the industrial
agriculture system and those that have become a part of
it.
Contract Growing
Contract growing is used primarily in the industrial production
of hogs and chickens. In this arrangement, a corporation that
owns livestock contracts with farmers to raise the animals to
maturity. Without a contract, a farmer must manage slaughtering,
processing, and distributing as well, all while keeping sale
prices low enough to compete in a corporate-controlled
marketplace. From afar, it might seem like a good deal.
Here's how a contract
growing system works:
- A major food corporation delivers to
the farm both feed and a large number of immature animals. (In
the case of chickens, the animals often arrive on the same day
that they are hatched.) This allows the corporation to control
the breed of the animals and the content of their feed.
- The farmer raises the animals for a
pre-determined amount of time, after which the company
collects, slaughters, processes and distributes them.
- The corporation returns with another
round of animals and feed, and the cycle repeats.
While this system guarantees farmers a market for their
animals, it also burdens them with tremendous financial risk.
Farmers must pay for all feed, and absorb any financial loss
from animals that die. Farmers must invest considerable capital
to build structures for housing the animals, a debt they carry
for years, even decades. Once they own the buildings, they must
pay for maintenance, utilities and insurance costs. Farmers are
also responsible for disposing of the animals’ waste,
which means either building receptacles for storage, selling it
as fertilizer, or renting land where it can be spread.
Throughout the process, the corporation maintains full
control over the animals involved. If a farmer becomes
"non-competitive'' (meaning he or she can't raise the
animals cheaply enough), the corporation may choose not to renew
the contract. But because banks will not renew loans unless a
farmer has a contract, getting dumped by one corporation leaves
no option but to sign up with another. Too long spent with empty
barns and unpaid mortgages will drive a farmer into bankruptcy.
Because corporations rarely define exactly what
“staying competitive” entails, farmers often find
that the only way to survive is to cut every possible cost. Too
often, that includes the costs involved with responsibly caring
for the animals and appropriately handling their waste. The
helpless farmer is reduced from a steward of the land to someone
who manages an industrial process.
Vertical Integration
One way that major corporations maximize profits is by
controlling all stages of the production and distribution
processes – otherwise known as vertical integration. In
addition to contracting with farms to raise their livestock,
corporations will own a feed company, a farm supply company, and
a processing and distribution company. This allows them to
profit from every level of food production without investing in
permanent assets like land or losing money to unpredictable
elements such as animal mortality.
Vertical integration also gives corporations enormous
control over meat and milk prices, in a fashion similar to
trusts and monopolies. They buy from farmers at rock-bottom
prices, then use the cheap product to drive prices down and
force out competitors, which consolidates their power even more.
In theory there is nothing wrong with vertical
integration, as long as corporations are operating within the
boundaries of the law. After all, any business should have the
right to adopt methods that maximize profits. But in
agribusiness, the system has undeniable consequences. It forces
farmers into debt, supports farming practices that harm the
environment and abuse animals, and compromises the quality of
the food we eat.
|